<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day to week.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toothsoup.com/blog/2009/02/12/day-to-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2009/02/12/day-to-week/</link>
	<description>white and creamy commentary from the stovetop of the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phill</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2009/02/12/day-to-week/comment-page-1/#comment-3939</link>
		<dc:creator>phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=803#comment-3939</guid>
		<description>Nice. I know my sis got an &#039;electric typewriter&#039; at one stage, which was kind of like the bridge between notebooks and typewriters. It was fucking noisy, awful looking, and took forever to set up. And I was ridiculously jealous. 

I&#039;m planning on providing snippets and links on a day-to-day basis while I research larger pieces. It&#039;s easy to do and keeps the momentum going so I don&#039;t want to skip a day. And hey, they&#039;re all going to be cool, trust me (;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. I know my sis got an &#8216;electric typewriter&#8217; at one stage, which was kind of like the bridge between notebooks and typewriters. It was fucking noisy, awful looking, and took forever to set up. And I was ridiculously jealous. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning on providing snippets and links on a day-to-day basis while I research larger pieces. It&#8217;s easy to do and keeps the momentum going so I don&#8217;t want to skip a day. And hey, they&#8217;re all going to be cool, trust me (;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2009/02/12/day-to-week/comment-page-1/#comment-3935</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=803#comment-3935</guid>
		<description>I have a smith-corona Sterling, which is &quot;flat&quot; compared to these, but it still makes a good showpiece, and if I could find ribbons for it, I&#039;d fuckin&#039; use it.  Old typewriters are the shit.
Since the SMC is mentioned in Naked Lunch,  I consider it a cool addition for a 5 dollar acquisition back in bumfuck 94.  Case was included, bonus.

And when did you become a link site?  lame.  Though I&#039;ll allow my own hypocrisy since I followed your typewriter link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a smith-corona Sterling, which is &#8220;flat&#8221; compared to these, but it still makes a good showpiece, and if I could find ribbons for it, I&#8217;d fuckin&#8217; use it.  Old typewriters are the shit.<br />
Since the SMC is mentioned in Naked Lunch,  I consider it a cool addition for a 5 dollar acquisition back in bumfuck 94.  Case was included, bonus.</p>
<p>And when did you become a link site?  lame.  Though I&#8217;ll allow my own hypocrisy since I followed your typewriter link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corsair</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2009/02/12/day-to-week/comment-page-1/#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Corsair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=803#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>Another reason I dislike the Sony Alpha200. It really requires a lot of postprocessing if you don&#039;t want the highlights to blow out. In fact, the dyamic range is the only reason those photos aren&#039;t my desktop, as his composition and framing is fantastic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason I dislike the Sony Alpha200. It really requires a lot of postprocessing if you don&#8217;t want the highlights to blow out. In fact, the dyamic range is the only reason those photos aren&#8217;t my desktop, as his composition and framing is fantastic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

