<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Untangling the Web #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toothsoup.com/blog/2010/02/16/untangling-the-web-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2010/02/16/untangling-the-web-2/</link>
	<description>white and creamy commentary from the stovetop of the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phill</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2010/02/16/untangling-the-web-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=1477#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading! :D 

Yeah, the problem with Amazon&#039;s initial pricing model was that they were making losses on each individual sale in order to push their e-reader and gain the majority market share on the hardware. Which means that a lot of people feel e-books should be around the $10 mark. And the publishers don&#039;t agree, leading to the situation we have now. There is definitely a sweet-spot to be ascertained, but I think it will be around the $10 mark, with &#039;specials&#039; leading to a $6 or $7 bargain range. 

Ooh, a discounted e-book if you already had the normal book would be very good. Not sure how on Earth they&#039;d enforce it, but that&#039;s what marketers are paid for, right? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading! :D </p>
<p>Yeah, the problem with Amazon&#8217;s initial pricing model was that they were making losses on each individual sale in order to push their e-reader and gain the majority market share on the hardware. Which means that a lot of people feel e-books should be around the $10 mark. And the publishers don&#8217;t agree, leading to the situation we have now. There is definitely a sweet-spot to be ascertained, but I think it will be around the $10 mark, with &#8216;specials&#8217; leading to a $6 or $7 bargain range. </p>
<p>Ooh, a discounted e-book if you already had the normal book would be very good. Not sure how on Earth they&#8217;d enforce it, but that&#8217;s what marketers are paid for, right? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2010/02/16/untangling-the-web-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=1477#comment-5411</guid>
		<description>Great post!

Frankly, I think ebooks should be &#039;cheap&#039; in general because people already have to pay hundreds for ebook readers anyway. Cheaper ebooks will be an added benefit for those of us who can&#039;t afford one of the readers.

That being said, I&#039;m also a writer, and the prices I have seen for ebooks are often too low, in my opinion. I&#039;m certainly not demanding ebook authors be paupers simply because of the media they choose to publish in. 

I don&#039;t have exact prices off the top of my head because I haven&#039;t had a proper, long sit down and think about it. I also don&#039;t have any truly creative pricing schemes either... I can only think that if you bought a specific author&#039;s ebook at full price, you could get a previously published book at some discounted price. 

As for genre... I stopped paying attention to that a long time ago. Haha. With all the mashups, it&#039;s better to just read the synopsis instead of trying to decipher or give labels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>Frankly, I think ebooks should be &#8216;cheap&#8217; in general because people already have to pay hundreds for ebook readers anyway. Cheaper ebooks will be an added benefit for those of us who can&#8217;t afford one of the readers.</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m also a writer, and the prices I have seen for ebooks are often too low, in my opinion. I&#8217;m certainly not demanding ebook authors be paupers simply because of the media they choose to publish in. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have exact prices off the top of my head because I haven&#8217;t had a proper, long sit down and think about it. I also don&#8217;t have any truly creative pricing schemes either&#8230; I can only think that if you bought a specific author&#8217;s ebook at full price, you could get a previously published book at some discounted price. </p>
<p>As for genre&#8230; I stopped paying attention to that a long time ago. Haha. With all the mashups, it&#8217;s better to just read the synopsis instead of trying to decipher or give labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phill</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2010/02/16/untangling-the-web-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5398</link>
		<dc:creator>phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=1477#comment-5398</guid>
		<description>@Elena: I think it depends on the person. For example, I know a lot of people who read exclusively science fiction, but then I hang with science nerds so it&#039;s not that surprising. 

I think that the marketers responsible for the business of selling books are the people that benefit the most from the genre classifications. Most people I talk to couldn&#039;t care less if a book is considered one genre or another, as long as it&#039;s a good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Elena: I think it depends on the person. For example, I know a lot of people who read exclusively science fiction, but then I hang with science nerds so it&#8217;s not that surprising. </p>
<p>I think that the marketers responsible for the business of selling books are the people that benefit the most from the genre classifications. Most people I talk to couldn&#8217;t care less if a book is considered one genre or another, as long as it&#8217;s a good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena</title>
		<link>http://toothsoup.com/blog/2010/02/16/untangling-the-web-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5393</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toothsoup.com/blog/?p=1477#comment-5393</guid>
		<description>Genre is a topic that could be discussed forever, whether in literature or film, or music. 

I doubt many readers, when asked &#039;what kind of books do you read&#039;, answer with a string of their preferred genres. In fact, that&#039;s possibly the most dangerous question to ask an avid reader.

Then again, I can see how genre/classification comes in handy when it comes to selling books. We need overarching stereotypes to function sanely. Especially when attempting to describe what is, essentially, a creative art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genre is a topic that could be discussed forever, whether in literature or film, or music. </p>
<p>I doubt many readers, when asked &#8216;what kind of books do you read&#8217;, answer with a string of their preferred genres. In fact, that&#8217;s possibly the most dangerous question to ask an avid reader.</p>
<p>Then again, I can see how genre/classification comes in handy when it comes to selling books. We need overarching stereotypes to function sanely. Especially when attempting to describe what is, essentially, a creative art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

